Report comment

Do you know the number for ? http://ayeh.fr/tv/ciprofloxacin-500-mg-bid-uti-tezr levofloxacino 750 san pablo As a mining engineer I am familiar with the basis of the argument made in this article. That LNG-export is solely in the interests of the industry and their shareholders is fairly well established. However, blocking LNG-exports would be an unusual step for the US because it doesnt have an energy policy. However, whos to say whether the government sees, or cares about the big picture of jobs, and the competitive dynamic of doing just this. As things stand, chemical producers using US natural gas for feedstock indeed have an immense cost advantage, which means jobs. Similarly, foundries, power plants, and other users of large scale amounts of energy have an advantage, which will dissipate with LNG-export. I guess its a matter of benefit for the few or benefit for the many, and this treads dangerously close to political thoughts contrary to the American way. Well see, wont we? If I were a betting man, Id put my money on the outcome being influenced by the vast number of dollars being spent to influence the politicians. What else is new?
We use cookies to improve our website. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. For more information visit our Cookie policy. I accept cookies from this site. Agree